Is this vulnerability remotely exploitable over the internet?

It can be, if the LDAP ingestion traffic traverses networks an attacker can influence (including the public internet or poorly segmented internal networks). The attacker needs to be able to intercept or manipulate the traffic path between DataHub and the LDAP server; it is not exploitable purely through the application's public HTTP interface.

What level of access does an attacker need to exploit this issue?

The attacker must have on-path network capabilities between the DataHub LDAP ingestion component and the LDAP server, such as control of a router, switch, proxy, or the ability to perform techniques like ARP or DNS spoofing within the relevant network segment.

What is the safest general fix pattern for this vulnerability class?

Enforce strong, fail-closed TLS semantics for all LDAP connections: require TLS, validate server certificates and hostnames, disallow insecure protocols and cipher suites, and ensure configuration cannot silently bypass these safeguards.

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.5)

Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in DataHub LDAP Ingestion TLS Handling

CVE-2026-25644

Published:

Feb 6, 2026

Status:

Analyzed

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

NDV

Recent Vulnerabilities

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

Remote Code Execution on the Router

April 6, 2026

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Remote Code Execution on Router Firmware

April 6, 2026

Vulnerability Type

Category:

Improper Certificate Validation / TLS Downgrade

CWE:

CWE-295

Impact:

Confidentiality and Integrity Compromise via Man-in-the-Middle

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.5)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Vulnerability Type

Category:

Improper Certificate Validation / TLS Downgrade

CWE:

CWE-295

Impact:

Confidentiality and Integrity Compromise via Man-in-the-Middle

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.5)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Get Started

Ship clean & secure code faster

START 14 DAYS FREE TRIAL

BOOK A DEMO

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in DataHub LDAP Ingestion TLS Handling

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

Recent Vulnerabilities

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Ship clean & secure code faster

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare