Is this vulnerability remotely exploitable?

It typically requires an attacker to deliver a crafted file that the victim opens in InfCode. In practice, this can be achieved remotely through shared repositories, emailed project bundles, or other file-sharing channels, but the actual execution occurs on the developer's machine when they interact with the file.

What level of access does an attacker need to exploit this issue?

The attacker needs the ability to influence or provide files that the IDE user will open, import, or inspect. They do not need local system access if they can distribute malicious project content that is later opened in the vulnerable environment.

What is the safest general fix pattern for this kind of vulnerability?

The most robust approach is to remove or strictly constrain auto-execution of commands derived from file content, replace blacklist-based filters with a minimal allowlist of supported actions, and use structured APIs rather than free-form shell execution. All potentially dangerous operations should require explicit user consent and be validated against a clearly defined, limited command grammar.

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.8)

OS Command Injection via Incomplete Command Filtering (CWE-78) in InfCode Terminal Auto-Execution Module

CVE-2026-30309

Published:

Mar 31, 2026

Status:

Awaiting Analysis

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

NDV

Recent Vulnerabilities

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

Remote Code Execution on the Router

April 6, 2026

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Remote Code Execution on Router Firmware

April 6, 2026

Vulnerability Type

Category:

OS Command Injection / Improper Input Neutralization

CWE:

CWE-78

Impact:

Arbitrary Command Execution and Data Exfiltration

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.8)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Vulnerability Type

Category:

OS Command Injection / Improper Input Neutralization

CWE:

CWE-78

Impact:

Arbitrary Command Execution and Data Exfiltration

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.8)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Get Started

Ship clean & secure code faster

START 14 DAYS FREE TRIAL

BOOK A DEMO

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

OS Command Injection via Incomplete Command Filtering (CWE-78) in InfCode Terminal Auto-Execution Module

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

Recent Vulnerabilities

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Ship clean & secure code faster

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare