Is this vulnerability remotely exploitable?

Yes, if an attacker can supply commands to an interface that DSAI-Cline auto-approves and executes, they can achieve remote code execution without needing direct shell access.

What level of access does an attacker need to exploit this?

The attacker must be able to influence or submit a command string to the auto-approval module. This could be via a chat interface, API, or integrated tool that feeds commands into DSAI-Cline, depending on how it is deployed.

What is the safest general fix pattern for this issue?

Replace free-form shell execution with structured, parameterized operations that do not rely on constructing command strings. If shell execution is unavoidable, strictly model allowed commands and arguments as data, normalize input, and reject anything outside a narrowly defined, audited allowlist.

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.8)

OS Command Injection via Newline Bypass (CWE-94) in DSAI-Cline Command Auto-Approval

CVE-2026-30313

Published:

Mar 30, 2026

Status:

Undergoing Analysis

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

NDV

Recent Vulnerabilities

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

Remote Code Execution on the Router

April 6, 2026

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Remote Code Execution on Router Firmware

April 6, 2026

Vulnerability Type

Category:

OS Command Injection

CWE:

CWE-94

Impact:

Remote Code Execution without user interaction

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.8)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Vulnerability Type

Category:

OS Command Injection

CWE:

CWE-94

Impact:

Remote Code Execution without user interaction

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.8)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Get Started

Ship clean & secure code faster

START 14 DAYS FREE TRIAL

BOOK A DEMO

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

OS Command Injection via Newline Bypass (CWE-94) in DSAI-Cline Command Auto-Approval

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

Recent Vulnerabilities

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Ship clean & secure code faster

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare