How broadly exploitable is this vulnerability?

Exploitation is limited to authenticated users with at least some thread access, but within that scope it can enable horizontal privilege escalation, allowing one user to access or delete files that belong to others if they can manipulate file references or identifiers.

What level of access does an attacker need?

An attacker must have a valid account on the PingPong platform. To exploit retrieval, they need permission to view at least one thread; to exploit deletion, they need permission to participate in at least one thread. No elevated administrator privileges are required.

What is the safest general fix pattern?

The most robust fix is to enforce strict object-level authorization for every file operation, ensuring that for each request the system checks whether the authenticated user is explicitly authorized to view or delete the targeted file based on ownership or well-defined sharing rules, rather than relying only on general thread access.

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(8.8)

Insecure Direct Object Reference (CWE-639) in PingPong File Access Controls

CVE-2026-32097

Published:

Mar 11, 2026

Status:

Analyzed

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

NDV

Recent Vulnerabilities

CWE-918

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(8.6)

Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) in OpenClaw Zalo Plugin sendPhoto

Unauthorized Access to Internal Resources via SSRF

May 6, 2026

CWE-863

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(8.8)

Authorization Bypass (CWE-863) in OpenClaw Matrix Room Control Commands

Privilege Escalation via Bypassed Access Control

May 6, 2026

Vulnerability Type

Category:

Broken Access Control / Insecure Direct Object Reference

CWE:

CWE-639

Impact:

Unauthorized Data Access and Deletion

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(8.8)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Vulnerability Type

Category:

Broken Access Control / Insecure Direct Object Reference

CWE:

CWE-639

Impact:

Unauthorized Data Access and Deletion

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(8.8)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Get Started

Ship clean & secure code faster

Start Free Trial

Get Pentest Report

Ship clean & secure code faster

Start Free Trial

Get Pentest Report

Ship clean & secure code faster

Start Free Trial

Get Pentest Report

CodeAnt AI is an offensive and defensive security platform.

Defensive + offensive security.

From first line of code to a pentest
that knows every line of it.

SOC 2 Type II certified | CodeAnt AI is independently audited and compliant with SOC 2 Type II security standards

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Defensive + offensive security.

From first line of code to a pentest
that knows every line of it.

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Defensive + offensive security.

From first line of code to a pentest
that knows every line of it.

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Insecure Direct Object Reference (CWE-639) in PingPong File Access Controls

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

Recent Vulnerabilities

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(8.6)

Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) in OpenClaw Zalo Plugin sendPhoto

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(8.8)

Authorization Bypass (CWE-863) in OpenClaw Matrix Room Control Commands

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Ship clean & secure code faster

Ship clean & secure code faster

Ship clean & secure code faster

Product

Compare

Company

Developers

Legal

Product

Compare

Company

Developers

Legal

Product

Compare

Company

Developers

Legal