Is this vulnerability remotely exploitable?

Yes. Anyone able to send reactions in a Feishu group chat that is integrated with OpenClaw can potentially trigger the vulnerability via the remote event interface, without needing direct network access to OpenClaw itself.

What level of access does an attacker need?

The attacker generally needs the ability to participate in or interact with a target Feishu group that is wired into OpenClaw. From there, they can leverage reaction events that are misclassified due to the missing `chat_type` field to bypass group-level protections.

What is the safest general fix pattern?

The safest pattern is to enforce strict, deny-by-default authorization based on robust context determination: treat missing or ambiguous `chat_type` as an error, require explicit and validated conversation metadata, and always apply group policies when an event may originate from a group context.

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.8)

Authorization Bypass via Misclassified Chat Type (CWE-863) in OpenClaw Feishu Reaction Events

CVE-2026-32924

Published:

Mar 29, 2026

Status:

Analyzed

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

NDV

Recent Vulnerabilities

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

Remote Code Execution on the Router

April 6, 2026

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Remote Code Execution on Router Firmware

April 6, 2026

Vulnerability Type

Category:

Authorization Bypass

CWE:

CWE-863

Impact:

Privilege Escalation and Policy Bypass in Group Chat Workflows

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.8)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Vulnerability Type

Category:

Authorization Bypass

CWE:

CWE-863

Impact:

Privilege Escalation and Policy Bypass in Group Chat Workflows

Severity:

CRITICAL RISK

(9.8)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Get Started

Ship clean & secure code faster

START 14 DAYS FREE TRIAL

BOOK A DEMO

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Authorization Bypass via Misclassified Chat Type (CWE-863) in OpenClaw Feishu Reaction Events

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

Recent Vulnerabilities

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Ship clean & secure code faster

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare