How broadly exploitable is this vulnerability?

Exploitability depends on how the host application exposes `resolve_type` or the surrounding parsing functionality. If untrusted users can influence the expressions or directives passed into this logic, exploitation can be remote and impactful; in tightly controlled deployments where only trusted administrators provide such input, the risk is lower but still present.

Does an attacker need authenticated access to exploit this?

Not necessarily. The key requirement is the ability to supply data that ultimately reaches the vulnerable function. In some integrations this may require authenticated API access, while in others a public endpoint, plugin, or workflow may forward anonymous user input into the parser.

What is the safest general fix pattern for developers using similar functionality?

The safest pattern is to remove or strictly limit dynamic evaluation: replace code-evaluating APIs with deterministic parsing that resolves only a predefined set of tokens or types, backed by a whitelist. Inputs should be validated against a clear grammar or schema, and anything outside that definition should be rejected rather than "cleaned."

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

Code Injection via Improper Neutralization in resolve_type (CWE-94) in letta-ai letta

CVE-2026-4965

Published:

Mar 27, 2026

Status:

Awaiting Analysis

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

NDV

Recent Vulnerabilities

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

Remote Code Execution on the Router

April 6, 2026

CWE-77;CWE-78

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Remote Code Execution on Router Firmware

April 6, 2026

Vulnerability Type

Category:

Code Injection / Dynamic Evaluation Vulnerability

CWE:

CWE-94;CWE-95

Impact:

Remote Code Execution

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Vulnerability Type

Category:

Code Injection / Dynamic Evaluation Vulnerability

CWE:

CWE-94;CWE-95

Impact:

Remote Code Execution

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Get Started

Ship clean & secure code faster

START 14 DAYS FREE TRIAL

BOOK A DEMO

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Code Injection via Improper Neutralization in resolve_type (CWE-94) in letta-ai letta

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

Recent Vulnerabilities

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setGameSpeedCfg CGI Handler

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU setFirewallType Handler

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Ship clean & secure code faster

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare