Is this vulnerability remotely exploitable?

Yes. The description indicates that the attack can be launched remotely, as long as an attacker can influence the `args` or `env` parameters that flow into the `StdioClientTransport` process creation logic.

What level of access does an attacker need to exploit this issue?

An attacker needs logical access to any interface that affects how the MCP Server Management System launches processes—this might be an API endpoint, protocol interaction, or configuration mechanism that ultimately controls `args` or `env`. Direct shell access is not required.

What is the safest general fix pattern for this vulnerability?

The most robust approach is to eliminate shell interpretation by using process-spawning APIs that accept a fixed executable path and a strongly-typed argument list, combined with strict whitelisting and validation of all values that can reach `args` or `env`. Any dynamic command construction should be replaced with controlled mappings from user actions to pre-defined, safe command configurations.

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in ChatboxAI Model Context Protocol Stdio Transport

CVE-2026-6130

Published:

Apr 12, 2026

Status:

Received

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

NDV

Recent Vulnerabilities

CWE-77;CWE-78

CRITICAL RISK

CRITICAL

(9.8)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU CGI Handler setAccessDeviceCfg

Remote Code Execution on the Router

April 12, 2026

CWE-77;CWE-78

CRITICAL RISK

CRITICAL

(9.8)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU CGI setLedCfg Handler

Remote Code Execution on the Router

April 12, 2026

Vulnerability Type

Category:

OS Command Injection

CWE:

CWE-77;CWE-78

Impact:

Remote Code Execution via OS Command Injection

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Vulnerability Type

Category:

OS Command Injection

CWE:

CWE-77;CWE-78

Impact:

Remote Code Execution via OS Command Injection

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Get Started

Ship clean & secure code faster

START 14 DAYS FREE TRIAL

BOOK A DEMO

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Made with Love in San Francisco

355 Bryant St. San Francisco, CA 94107, USA

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in ChatboxAI Model Context Protocol Stdio Transport

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

Recent Vulnerabilities

CRITICAL RISK

CRITICAL

(9.8)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU CGI Handler setAccessDeviceCfg

CRITICAL RISK

CRITICAL

(9.8)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in Totolink A7100RU CGI setLedCfg Handler

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Ship clean & secure code faster

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare

Product

Pricing

Company

Legal

Developers

Compare