Is this vulnerability remotely exploitable?

Yes, when the `quick_capture` functionality is exposed over a network interface or integrated into remotely accessible services, an attacker can potentially exploit it by sending crafted inputs that influence command construction.

What level of access does an attacker need?

The attacker must be able to interact with the component or API that ultimately calls `quick_capture` with user-controlled parameters. No local shell access is required if the capture feature is reachable over HTTP, RPC, or similar channels.

What is the safest general fix pattern?

Refactor command execution to avoid shell interpretation, pass arguments as structured lists to subprocess APIs, and strictly validate or allowlist all parameters that reach the command layer. This reduces the risk of injected control characters and unexpected command chaining.

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in A-G-U-P-T-A wireshark-mcp quick_capture Function

CVE-2026-7785

Published:

May 4, 2026

Status:

Deferred

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

NDV

Recent Vulnerabilities

CWE-918

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(8.6)

Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) in OpenClaw Zalo Plugin sendPhoto

Unauthorized Access to Internal Resources via SSRF

May 6, 2026

CWE-863

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(8.8)

Authorization Bypass (CWE-863) in OpenClaw Matrix Room Control Commands

Privilege Escalation via Bypassed Access Control

May 6, 2026

Vulnerability Type

Category:

OS Command Injection

CWE:

CWE-77;CWE-78

Impact:

Remote Code Execution via OS Command Injection

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Vulnerability Type

Category:

OS Command Injection

CWE:

CWE-77;CWE-78

Impact:

Remote Code Execution via OS Command Injection

Severity:

HIGH RISK

(7.3)

CVSS Version:

3.1

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Detect vulnerable code directly in pull requests, so CVEs are fixed before merge.

Get Started

Ship clean & secure code faster

Start Free Trial

Get Pentest Report

Ship clean & secure code faster

Start Free Trial

Get Pentest Report

Ship clean & secure code faster

Start Free Trial

Get Pentest Report

CodeAnt AI is an offensive and defensive security platform.

Defensive + offensive security.

From first line of code to a pentest
that knows every line of it.

SOC 2 Type II certified | CodeAnt AI is independently audited and compliant with SOC 2 Type II security standards

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Defensive + offensive security.

From first line of code to a pentest
that knows every line of it.

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

Defensive + offensive security.

From first line of code to a pentest
that knows every line of it.

Ask AI for summary of CodeAnt

OS Command Injection (CWE-78) in A-G-U-P-T-A wireshark-mcp quick_capture Function

Summary

Affected Context

Exploit Preconditions

Why This Happens

Potential Impact

General Mitigation Guidance

How Teams Detect Issues Like This

Frequently Asked Questions

Source

Recent Vulnerabilities

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(8.6)

Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) in OpenClaw Zalo Plugin sendPhoto

HIGH RISK

HIGH

(8.8)

Authorization Bypass (CWE-863) in OpenClaw Matrix Room Control Commands

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Vulnerability Type

Catch This CVE While Code Is Being Written

Ship clean & secure code faster

Ship clean & secure code faster

Ship clean & secure code faster

Product

Compare

Company

Developers

Legal

Product

Compare

Company

Developers

Legal

Product

Compare

Company

Developers

Legal