11 Best Graphite Alternatives for AI Code Review [2025 Edition]

Graphite's Diamond AI code reviewer delivers fast, context-aware feedback with generous limits for solo developers. But as teams scale and workflows get more complex, many developers find themselves hitting walls, major reason why devs are looking for graphite alternatives.

Maybe you need deeper security scanning that catches vulnerabilities before they hit production. Perhaps you want AI that actually understands your entire codebase, not just the diff you're reviewing. Or you're looking for tools that can auto-fix issues instead of just flagging them, saving hours of manual cleanup work.

Whatever your specific pain point, the AI code review landscape has exploded with alternatives that push far beyond Graphite's capabilities.

In this guide, we'll explore 11 powerful Graphite alternatives that developers are using to ship faster, safer code in 2025. From CodeAnt.ai's unified security and quality platform to automated bug fixing, we'll break down:

• What makes each tool unique, and why teams are switching

• Honest pros and cons based on developer feedback + internet sentiment

• Pricing breakdowns and team fit analysis

Whether you're a solo developer tired of limited features, a startup team needing better security coverage, or an enterprise organization requiring enterprise-grade compliance, this guide will help you find an AI code reviewer that accelerates your development instead of holding it back.

How We Chose These Graphite Alternatives

We tested each tool on real pull requests and tracked what developers are actually saying across Reddit, GitHub discussions, and developer forums. No marketing fluff, just what works.

Our research process:

1. Community feedback analysis We scanned Reddit and Twitter to see which tools people recommend and which ones they complain about. Real user experiences beat marketing claims every time.

2. Hands-on testing Each tool got tested on actual codebases with security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and code quality problems. Tools that missed obvious bugs or generated too much noise got cut.

3. Integration reality check We set up each tool from scratch to see if the "5-minute setup" claims are real or if you need a PhD in DevOps to get them working.

4. Pricing verification We calculated real costs for 5, 20, and 100+ developer teams. Hidden fees and surprise overages got called out.

5. Enterprise requirements SOC 2 compliance, on-premises deployment, and data retention policies - we verified what's real versus what's just on the marketing page.

The tools that made this list consistently delivered useful feedback, integrated smoothly, and had developers saying "this actually saves time" instead of "this creates more work."

So before we deep dive into the tools, here is a table so you can skim through: 

Comparison Table on Best Graphite Alternatives for AI Code Review

We shortlisted the best Graphite alternatives for your Ai code review .

Okay, now, let’s dive in. 

1. CodeAnt.ai

CodeAnt AI is the unified platform that replaces 4-5 separate tools for code reviews, security scanning, and developer metrics. It cuts manual review time by 50% while catching security vulnerabilities and code quality issues that human reviewers typically miss. 

CodeAnt AI Key Features:

• Unified Security + Quality Platform - Combines SAST, secret scanning, IaC security, and code quality in one tool instead of juggling multiple vendors

• Bulk Auto-Fix Capabilities - Fixes up to 200 files in a single click for issues like dead code, duplicates, and security vulnerabilities

• Enterprise-Ready Compliance - SOC 2 & HIPAA compliant with on-premises deployment, zero data retention, and audit-ready PDF/CSV reports

• Custom Rules in Plain English - Define coding standards like "All database queries must use prepared statements" without writing complex YAML

• Real-Time PR Reviews - Reviews pull requests in under 2 minutes with AI summaries, one-click fixes, and chat functionality

• Cross-Platform Integration - Works with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps plus 30+ programming languages

Limitations:

• No Free Plan - Starts at $10/user/month with no permanently free tier. But we have a 14-day free trial 😉 

Pricing: 

• AI Code Review: $10/user/month

• Code Quality Platform: $150/10-user/month 

• Code Security Platform: $150/10-user/month (can be combined) 

• + Custom enterprise plans. 

• Free for OSS

Best for: 

Small to mid-sized to enterprise teams (20+ developers) who want to consolidate multiple tools, need strong security compliance, and can invest time in proper setup. Particularly valuable for teams in regulated industries or handling sensitive data who need SOC 2/HIPAA compliance.

Check out this comparison - Codeant.ai vs Graphite.dev 

2. Greptile

Greptile Key Features:

• Full Codebase Understanding - Generates a detailed graph of your codebase and understands how everything connects, unlike diff-only tools

• Language-Agnostic - Works with any programming language or framework, from Python to Rust to Go

• Self-Hosting Option - SOC 2 Type II compliant with self-hosted deployment for maximum security

Limitations:

• Higher Price Point - $30/user/month makes it one of the more expensive options in the market

• Context Window Limits - Won't work effectively on huge pull requests due to LLM context limitations

• Learning Curve - Teams report needing time to properly configure custom rules and context

Pricing: 

$30/user/month with unlimited code reviews, up to 20% off for annual contracts

Best for: 

Mid-sized to enterprise teams with complex, interconnected codebases who need deep contextual understanding and can justify the higher cost.

Check out the comparison - Greptile vs CodeAnt.ai

3. CodeRabbit

CodeRabbit combines popular static analyzers with advanced AI reasoning models to deliver context-aware reviews with the best signal-to-noise ratio. Teams report it catches subtle bugs like DTO mistakes and validation improvements that human reviewers typically miss.

CodeRabbit Key Features:

• Code-Graph Analysis - Uses AST analysis for deep code structure understanding rather than just pattern matching

• Interactive Learning - Learns your team's preferences and coding standards from PR comments and reactions

• Quick-Fix Patches - Provides one-click fixes for common issues directly in PR comments

Limitations:

• GitHub-Centric - Limited primarily to GitHub, lacking strong support for GitLab and Bitbucket

• Surface-Level Reviews - Reviews can be shallow for complex projects, missing architectural issues

• Free Tier Restrictions - Free plan only includes PR summarization, missing the tool's real value

Pricing: 

Lite: $12/user/month, Pro: $24/user/month (billed annually)

Best for:

Small to medium GitHub-focused teams who want quick setup and don't need deep architectural analysis.

Check out this comparison - Codeant.ai vs CodeRabbit 

4. Qodo Merge (formerly CodiumAI)

Qodo Merge provides expert-level insights by understanding your entire codebase and learning your team's unique patterns and standards. It offers powerful slash commands like /review, /improve, and /describe that make getting specific help incredibly easy. 

Qodo Merge Key Features:

• RAG-Powered Context - Uses codebase awareness through RAG-based context indexing for precise suggestions

• Multi-Repo Support - Works equally well with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket - the only tool with true multi-platform parity

• Command-Based Interface - Intuitive slash commands (/describe, /review, /improve) make it easy to get exactly what you need

Limitations:

• Enterprise Features Locked - Advanced features like SOC2 compliance and static analysis require paid plans

• Self-Hosting Complexity - Open-source version requires more configuration compared to plug-and-play alternatives

• Learning Period - Takes time to adapt to your team's feedback and coding standards

Pricing: 

Developer: Free (75 PRs/month), Teams: $30/user/month, Enterprise: Custom.

Best for: 

Teams using GitLab/Bitbucket or those needing self-hosting options, plus enterprises requiring multi-repo awareness and strict compliance.

5. Panto AI

Panto AI runs 30,000+ static analysis checks across 30+ languages on every PR, combining SAST, secret scanning, and IaC analysis in one security-first platform.

Panto AI Key Features:

• Security-First Approach - 30,000+ rules for SAST, secret detection, IaC scanning, and open-source license scanning with extremely low noise ratio

• Business Context Integration - Ties code changes to related Jira/Confluence context to understand why changes were made

• High Signal-to-Noise Ratio - Prioritizes security and flags critical issues early while keeping false positives low

Limitations:

• Setup Complexity - Onboarding is still maturing with some users finding initial setup less polished than competitors

• Documentation Gaps - Limited documentation for advanced configuration, especially for complex use cases

• Overwhelming for Small Teams - Some small teams may not need all 30K checks and could find the tool's depth overwhelming at first

Pricing: 

Free for open source projects, Code review: $12/dev/month, Code review+Code Security: $15/developer/month. Enterprise has a custom plan. 

Best for: 

Security-conscious teams who need comprehensive vulnerability detection with business context and can handle a more thorough setup process.

6. Ellipsis

Ellipsis goes beyond ai code review to actually fix bugs and implement features - you can assign work via GitHub comments and get working, tested code within minutes. 

Ellipsis Key Features:

• Automated Bug Fixing - Goes beyond review to fix bugs and create features from GitHub comments, delivering working code in minutes

• Multi-File Code Changes - Creates multi-file code changes from natural language requirements like bug reports or feature requests

• ~13% Faster Merges - Teams report significantly faster development cycles with automated fixes and release notes

Limitations:

• GitHub-Only - Bitbucket and other platforms cannot use Ellipsis, limiting platform flexibility

• Learning Curve - Teams may need time to fine-tune feedback preferences for optimal results

• No Code Storage - Doesn't store or train on your source code, but some teams want persistent learning capabilities

Pricing: 

7-day free trial, then $20/month for unlimited usage.

Best for: 

GitHub teams who want to automate not just reviews but actual bug fixes and feature development, especially useful for handling routine tasks.

7. Aikido Security

Aikido combines SAST, DAST, container scanning, secrets detection, and cloud security into one developer-friendly platform that reduces noise by 95%. 

Aikido Security Key Features:

• Comprehensive Security Platform - SAST, DAST, container scanning, secrets detection, IaC analysis, and cloud posture management in one unified dashboard

• Smart Vulnerability Filtering - AI-powered triage filters out false positives and non-exploitable issues, reducing alert fatigue significantly

• AI Auto-Fix - Generates pull requests to fix SAST, IaC, dependency, and container issues automatically

Limitations:

• Enterprise Features Limited - Complex RBAC, compliance dashboards, and advanced API support not fully addressed for large enterprises yet

• Language Coverage Gaps - Limited support for some frameworks or legacy stacks, particularly non-mainstream tech

• High Entry Price - First paid tier is $250/month for up to 10 users, though startups get up to 50% discount

Pricing: 

Free plan available, paid plans start at $250/month for up to 10 users

Best for: 

Mid-sized teams who want comprehensive security coverage with minimal false positives and can justify the higher price point for consolidated tooling.

8. Bito AI Code Review Agent

Bito's AI Code Review Agent is a good graphite alternative, it speeds up PR merges with great amount of time, reduces regressions by 34%, and delivers 87% human-grade feedback. 

Bito AI Code Review Agent Key Features:

• Full-Repo Understanding - Uses RAG and AST parsing to deeply understand your entire codebase for context-aware suggestions

• Multi-Platform Support - Seamlessly integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and self-managed instances

• Custom Rules - Set repository-specific code review guidelines to enforce standards and team nuances for every pull request

Limitations:

• Beta IDE Features - IDE integration is currently in limited beta for enterprise teams by request only

• No Code Storage - Doesn't store or train models on your code, but some teams want persistent learning capabilities

• Seat-Based Pricing - Only counts seats when PRs are reviewed, but still requires manual seat management

Pricing: 

Free forever plan for PR summaries, Team plan at $15/user/month up to 25 seats, Enterprise at $25/user/month up to unlimited seats.

Best for: 

Growing teams who want comprehensive codebase understanding with measurable productivity gains and don't mind managing seat assignments manually.

9. Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer

Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer uses machine learning and automated reasoning trained on hundreds of thousands of internal projects plus 10,000+ open source GitHub projects.

Amazon CodeGuru Reviewer Key Features:

• AWS-Focused Analysis - Specialized in AWS API best practices, polling, pagination, and cloud-native development patterns

• Performance Detection - Identifies expensive lines of code and provides cost-specific recommendations with resolution steps

• Usage-Based Pricing - Fixed monthly rates based on repository size with 90-day free tier up to 100K lines of code

Limitations:

• Limited Language Support - Only supports Java and Python, making it unsuitable for diverse tech stacks

• AWS Ecosystem Lock-in - Requires AWS infrastructure (EC2, ECS, Fargate) and works best within AWS ecosystem

• Basic Review Scope - Simply adds automated comments to PRs without deeper integration or fix capabilities

Pricing: 

90-day free trial up to 100K LoC, then $10/month for repositories up to 100K lines, with scaling tiers

Best for: 

AWS-heavy teams using Java/Python who want performance optimization and cloud-native best practices integrated into their development workflow.

10. Tabnine Code Review Agent

Tabnine's Code Review Agent, and a decent graphite alternative, it is the first-of-its-kind AI that converts your team's unique standards and institutional knowledge into automated rules using plain language. 

Tabnine Code Review Agent Key Features:

• Converts Docs to Rules - Takes your accepted standards, best practices, or corporate policies written in plain language and converts them into comprehensive rules

• IDE Integration - Reviews code directly inside your code editor, flagging deviations with explanations and fix suggestions

• Enterprise Preview - Code Review Agent designed to ensure quality, security, and compliance with team-specific customization

Limitations:

• Enterprise-Only - Enterprise Plan at $39/user/month required for Code Review Agent features

• Still in Preview - Recently launched feature that may have limited availability and ongoing development

• Setup Complexity - Requires initial effort to define standards and train the agent on your team's specific practices

Pricing: 

Free basic plan, Pro at $12/user/month, Enterprise at $39/user/month with 90-day free trial

Best for: 

Enterprise teams with well-defined coding standards who want to automate institutional knowledge and enforce consistent practices across large development organizations.

11. Sourcegraph Cody

Sourcegraph Cody goes beyond individual productivity to help enterprises achieve consistency and quality at scale with whole codebase context. Users report significant efficiency gains, with some saving up to six hours per week and doubling their coding speed. Unlike generic AI chatbots, Cody brings deep code intelligence by integrating with Sourcegraph's code search capabilities.

Sourcegraph Cody Key Features:

• Codebase-Aware Assistant - Uses whole codebase context and shared prompts to ensure quality and consistency across enterprises

• Documentation Integration - Connects with tools like Notion, Linear, and Prometheus to enhance development context

• IDE-Native Experience - Deep integration with IDEs like VS Code, PyCharm, and JetBrains without disrupting workflows

Limitations:

• Context Accuracy Issues - Sometimes the context selected isn't the most useful, and users struggle to exclude certain files

• Pattern Memory Problems - Doesn't follow patterns consistently within single chat sessions, forgetting established coding styles

• Expensive Enterprise Tier - Enterprise plan at $49/user/month may be costly for smaller teams

Pricing: 

Free plan with 200 chats/month, Pro at $19/user/month, Enterprise at $49/user/month

Best for: 

Teams working with large, complex codebases who need deep code understanding and can benefit from enterprise-grade search and context capabilities.

The Best Graphite Alternatives Are Here - Time to Upgrade

Manual code reviews are killing your productivity. Your senior engineers spend 40% or maybe more of their time on tedious reviews while critical bugs still slip through.

We've analyzed 11 leading Graphite alternatives, and here's the truth:

• Speed-first tools give quick feedback but miss the security issues that actually matter.

• Security-focused platforms catch vulnerabilities but create so much noise teams start ignoring alerts.

• Enterprise solutions promise everything but need months of setup for basic functionality.

• Budget options look attractive until you realize you need 3-4 additional tools to get real coverage.

Here's the reality: piecemeal solutions create piecemeal results.

Juggling separate tools for reviews, security, and quality doesn't just cost more - it fragments workflows, creates blind spots, and burns out developers.

The teams winning in 2025 get it: the best tool isn't the one with the most features - it's the one that unifies everything without the complexity.

That means AI code reviews that actually understand your codebase. Security scanning that catches real threats, not false positives. Auto-fixes that save hours, not create more work. Enterprise compliance that doesn't slow development.

The Bottom Line: Stop playing tool Tetris with mismatched solutions that drain your budget and frustrate your team.

Ready to see what unified code review actually looks like? Start your free 14-day CodeAnt.ai trial and discover why leading teams choose one powerful platform over a dozen fragmented tools. No credit card required.